↓ Skip to main content

Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
40 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004013.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas BL Lam, Muhammad Imran Omar, Euan Fisher, Katie Gillies, Sara MacLennan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 239 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 39 16%
Other 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Researcher 21 9%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 55 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Chemistry 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 64 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#700,088
of 19,342,442 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,645
of 11,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,929
of 220,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,342,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.