You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subnotificação de sífilis em gestantes, congênita e adquirida entre povos indígenas em Mato Grosso do Sul, 2011-2014
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742017000300008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zuleica da Silva Tiago, Renata Palópoli Picoli, Samara Vilas-Boas Graeff, Rivaldo Venâncio da Cunha, Rui Arantes, Zuleica da Silva Tiago, Renata Palópoli Picoli, Samara Vilas-Boas Graeff, Rivaldo Venâncio da Cunha, Rui Arantes |
| Abstract |
to describe the distribution, incidence, and underreporting of syphilis among indigenous peoples from Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. descriptive study performed with secondary data of the Information System for Notifiable Diseases (Sinan) and of the Special Indigenous Sanitary District of Mato Grosso do Sul (DSEI-MS), from 2011 to 2014; the data from both sources were compared to identify underreporting. the highest incidence rates of syphilis in pregnant women were observed in 2014 (41.1/1,000 live births) and of congenital syphilis, in 2013 (10.7/1,000 live births); the highest numbers of underreporting of cases were for syphilis in pregnant women on Sinan (45/79), of congenital syphilis at DSEI-MS (8/17) in 2014, and of acquired syphilis on Sinan in 2011 and 2013 (5/9 and 10/18, respectively). syphilis has a high incidence; underreporting hides the extent of the disease in indigenous peoples from Mato Grosso do Sul. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,173,117
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#157
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,860
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.