↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of neonatal seizure management strategies provides guidance on anti‐epileptic treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Paediatrica, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of neonatal seizure management strategies provides guidance on anti‐epileptic treatment
Published in
Acta Paediatrica, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/apa.12812
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lena Hellström‐Westas, Geraldine Boylan, Johan Ågren

Abstract

There is a lack of scientific evidence to support the best management of neonatal seizures. Current strategies for neonatal seizure management were investigated by analysis of all surveys published during the time period 2000-2012. Methods for seizure diagnosis and availability of electroencephalogram (EEG), including monitoring, varied. Phenobarbital was the drug of first choice, and the use of off-label drugs and treatment times varied.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 32 29%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 54%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 18 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#5,585,712
of 21,321,525 outputs
Outputs from Acta Paediatrica
#1,241
of 5,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,092
of 224,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Paediatrica
#14
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,321,525 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.