↓ Skip to main content

Rapid bacterial colonization of low-density polyethylene microplastics in coastal sediment microcosms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
419 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
689 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid bacterial colonization of low-density polyethylene microplastics in coastal sediment microcosms
Published in
BMC Microbiology, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12866-014-0232-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse P Harrison, Michaela Schratzberger, Melanie Sapp, A Mark Osborn

Abstract

Synthetic microplastics (≤5-mm fragments) are emerging environmental contaminants that have been found to accumulate within coastal marine sediments worldwide. The ecological impacts and fate of microplastic debris are only beginning to be revealed, with previous research into these topics having primarily focused on higher organisms and/or pelagic environments. Despite recent research into plastic-associated microorganisms in seawater, the microbial colonization of microplastics in benthic habitats has not been studied. Therefore, we employed a 14-day microcosm experiment to investigate bacterial colonization of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) microplastics within three types of coastal marine sediment from Spurn Point, Humber Estuary, U.K.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 689 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
India 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 674 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 121 18%
Student > Bachelor 98 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 14%
Researcher 94 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 4%
Other 80 12%
Unknown 171 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 157 23%
Environmental Science 152 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 3%
Other 78 11%
Unknown 205 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,429,842
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#63
of 3,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,195
of 265,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,538 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.