↓ Skip to main content

Hepatitis B virus vaccination booster does not provide additional protection in adolescents: a cross-sectional school-based study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hepatitis B virus vaccination booster does not provide additional protection in adolescents: a cross-sectional school-based study
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-991
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yung-Chieh Chang, Jen-Hung Wang, Yu-Sheng Chen, Jun-Song Lin, Ching-Feng Cheng, Chia-Hsiang Chu

Abstract

Current consensus does not support the use of a universal booster of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine because there is an anamnestic response in almost all children 15 years after universal infant HBV vaccination. We aimed to provide a booster strategy among adolescents as a result of their changes in lifestyle and sexual activity.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 25%
Unspecified 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,596,683
of 16,055,825 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,671
of 11,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,080
of 212,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,055,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them