↓ Skip to main content

Hepatitis B virus vaccination booster does not provide additional protection in adolescents: a cross-sectional school-based study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hepatitis B virus vaccination booster does not provide additional protection in adolescents: a cross-sectional school-based study
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-991
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yung-Chieh Chang, Jen-Hung Wang, Yu-Sheng Chen, Jun-Song Lin, Ching-Feng Cheng, Chia-Hsiang Chu

Abstract

Current consensus does not support the use of a universal booster of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine because there is an anamnestic response in almost all children 15 years after universal infant HBV vaccination. We aimed to provide a booster strategy among adolescents as a result of their changes in lifestyle and sexual activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 7 28%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2014.
All research outputs
#13,409,213
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,365
of 15,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,659
of 253,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#168
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.