You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide in patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs in Greece
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-419 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charalampos Tzanetakos, Andreas Melidonis, Christos Verras, Georgia Kourlaba, Nikos Maniadakis |
Abstract |
To evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide, added to oral antidiabetic drug mono- or combination therapy respectively, in patients with Type 2 diabetes in Greece. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 22% |
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 29% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,136,648
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,877
of 7,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,092
of 251,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#50
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.