↓ Skip to main content

You are how you recruit: a cohort and randomized controlled trial of recruitment strategies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
You are how you recruit: a cohort and randomized controlled trial of recruitment strategies
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-14-111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Maghera, Paul Kahlke, Amanda Lau, Yiye Zeng, Chris Hoskins, Tom Corbett, Donna Manca, Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil, Denise Hemmings, Piush Mandhane

Abstract

Recruitment is a challenge in developing population-representative pregnancy and birth cohorts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 24%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#19,784,347
of 24,312,464 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,864
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,228
of 257,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,312,464 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.