You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Organizational participatory research: a systematic mixed studies review exposing its extra benefits and the key factors associated with them
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-017-0648-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paula L. Bush, Pierre Pluye, Christine Loignon, Vera Granikov, Michael T. Wright, Jean-François Pelletier, Gillian Bartlett-Esquilant, Ann C. Macaulay, Jeannie Haggerty, Sharon Parry, Carol Repchinsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 18% |
| Canada | 8 | 14% |
| Australia | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 50% |
| Scientists | 20 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Psychology | 13 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#995,336
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#129
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,415
of 336,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.