You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PSFj: know your fluorescence microscope
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Theer, Cyril Mongis, Michael Knop |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Germany | 2 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 269 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 25% |
| Researcher | 71 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 15% |
| Unknown | 42 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 40 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 34 | 12% |
| Engineering | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,028,127
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,572
of 4,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,504
of 252,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#48
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.