You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-resolution three-dimensional imaging of large specimens with light sheet–based microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth1017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter J Verveer, Jim Swoger, Francesco Pampaloni, Klaus Greger, Marco Marcello, Ernst H K Stelzer |
| Abstract |
We report that single (or selective) plane illumination microscopy (SPIM), combined with a new deconvolution algorithm, provides a three-dimensional spatial resolution exceeding that of confocal fluorescence microscopy in large samples. We demonstrate this by imaging large living multicellular specimens obtained in a three-dimensional cell culture. The ability to rapidly image large samples at high resolution with minimal photodamage provides new opportunities especially for the study of subcellular processes in large living specimens. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 407 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 131 | 29% |
| Researcher | 99 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 127 | 28% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 90 | 20% |
| Engineering | 64 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 54 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,897,849
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,069
of 5,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,153
of 78,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.