You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-5-23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard N Shiffman, Jane Dixon, Cynthia Brandt, Abdelwaheb Essaihi, Allen Hsiao, George Michel, Ryan O'Connell |
| Abstract |
Clinical practice guidelines are not uniformly successful in influencing clinicians' behaviour toward best practices. Implementability refers to a set of characteristics that predict ease of (and obstacles to) guideline implementation. Our objective is to develop and validate a tool for appraisal of implementability of clinical guidelines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 235 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 76 | 29% |
| Unknown | 35 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 36% |
| Psychology | 22 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,643,081
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#165
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,638
of 71,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.