You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2050-6511-15-55 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth C Moylan, Simon Harold, Ciaran O’Neill, Maria K Kowalczuk |
| Abstract |
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology was created from the merger of two journals within the BMC series published by BioMed Central: BMC Pharmacology and BMC Clinical Pharmacology. BMC Pharmacology operated anonymous peer review whereas BMC Clinical Pharmacology operated a fully open peer review policy where the identity of the reviewers was known to the editors, authors and readers. The merged journal also adopted a fully open peer review policy. Two years on we discuss the views and experiences of our Editorial Board Members towards open peer review on this biomedical journal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 31% |
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 12% |
| Romania | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
| Scientists | 9 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Librarian | 6 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2020.
All research outputs
#798,303
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#6
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,366
of 252,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.