↓ Skip to main content

A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for cryptosporidium

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
736 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
675 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for cryptosporidium
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(14)70772-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Checkley, A Clinton White, Devan Jaganath, Michael J Arrowood, Rachel M Chalmers, Xian-Ming Chen, Ronald Fayer, Jeffrey K Griffiths, Richard L Guerrant, Lizbeth Hedstrom, Christopher D Huston, Karen L Kotloff, Gagandeep Kang, Jan R Mead, Mark Miller, William A Petri, Jeffrey W Priest, David S Roos, Boris Striepen, R C Andrew Thompson, Honorine D Ward, Wesley A Van Voorhis, Lihua Xiao, Guan Zhu, Eric R Houpt

Abstract

Cryptosporidium spp are well recognised as causes of diarrhoeal disease during waterborne epidemics and in immunocompromised hosts. Studies have also drawn attention to an underestimated global burden and suggest major gaps in optimum diagnosis, treatment, and immunisation. Cryptosporidiosis is increasingly identified as an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Studies in low-resource settings and high-income countries have confirmed the importance of cryptosporidium as a cause of diarrhoea and childhood malnutrition. Diagnostic tests for cryptosporidium infection are suboptimum, necessitating specialised tests that are often insensitive. Antigen-detection and PCR improve sensitivity, and multiplexed antigen detection and molecular assays are underused. Therapy has some effect in healthy hosts and no proven efficacy in patients with AIDS. Use of cryptosporidium genomes has helped to identify promising therapeutic targets, and drugs are in development, but methods to assess the efficacy in vitro and in animals are not well standardised. Partial immunity after exposure suggests the potential for successful vaccines, and several are in development; however, surrogates of protection are not well defined. Improved methods for propagation and genetic manipulation of the organism would be significant advances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 675 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 668 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 102 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 14%
Researcher 90 13%
Student > Master 76 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 5%
Other 114 17%
Unknown 165 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 97 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 80 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 57 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 42 6%
Other 87 13%
Unknown 198 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,400,867
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1,757
of 6,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,181
of 264,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#22
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.