↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of inpatient specialist palliative care in acute hospitals for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of inpatient specialist palliative care in acute hospitals for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012780
Authors

Sabrina Bajwah, Deokhee Yi, Gunn Grande, Chris Todd, Massimo Costantini, Fliss E Murtagh, Catherine J Evans, Irene J Higginson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 26%
Unspecified 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 22%
Unspecified 4 17%
Social Sciences 4 17%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,263,807
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,751
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,181
of 273,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.