↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2208-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margreet Meems, Viola Spek, Willem J. Kop, Berend-Jan Meems, Leo H. Visser, Victor J. M. Pop

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common, compressive nerve-entrapment disorder with symptoms of numbness, paresthesia, and pain. Carpal tunnel release surgery is the only known long-term effective treatment. However, surgery is invasive and up to 30% of patients report recurrence or persistence of symptoms or suffer from post-surgical complications. A promising non-surgical treatment for CTS is mechanical wrist traction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes following mechanical traction in patients with CTS compared to care as usual. Adult patients (N = 181, mean age 58.1 (13.0) years, 67% women) with electrodiagnostically confirmed CTS were recruited from an outpatient neurology clinic in the Netherlands between October 2013 and April 2015. After baseline assessments, patients were randomized to either the intervention group (12 treatments with mechanical traction, twice a week for a period of 6 weeks) or "care as usual". The main clinical outcome measure was surgery during 6 months' follow-up. In addition, symptom severity was measured using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) at baseline, 3, and 6 months' follow-up. Baseline characteristics and severity of CTS symptoms at follow-up were compared between the intervention and care-as-usual groups using a t test and χ (2) tests. Time to event (surgery) between the groups was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis. The intervention group had fewer surgeries (28%) compared to the care-as-usual group (43%) during follow-up (χ(2)1 = 4.40, p = .036). Analyses of the survival curves revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups over time (log-rank test χ (2)1 = 6.94, p = .008). At 6 months' follow-up, symptom severity and functional status scores had significantly decreased from baseline in both groups (p < .001) and the improvements did not differ between the two groups. Mechanical traction is associated with fewer surgical interventions compared to care as usual in CTS patients. Reductions in patient-reported symptoms at 6 months' follow-up was similar in both groups. The long-term effects of mechanical traction require further evaluation. ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NL44692.008.13 . Registered on 19 September 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 19%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 35 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Psychology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 32 42%