↓ Skip to main content

Detection of Ichthyophonus by chromogenic in situ hybridization

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fish Diseases, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of Ichthyophonus by chromogenic in situ hybridization
Published in
Journal of Fish Diseases, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/jfd.12300
Pubmed ID
Authors

C M Conway, M K Purcell, D G Elliott, P K Hershberger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 71%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 71%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#11,846,831
of 13,353,516 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish Diseases
#572
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,988
of 212,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish Diseases
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,353,516 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.