↓ Skip to main content

A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom
Published in
Medical Physics, October 2014
DOI 10.1118/1.4896097
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Lye, John Kenny, Joerg Lehmann, Leon Dunn, Tomas Kron, Andrew Alves, Andrew Cole, Ivan Williams

Abstract

The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS) has implemented a new method of a nonreference condition Level II type dosimetric audit of radiotherapy services to increase measurement accuracy and patient safety within Australia. The aim of this work is to describe the methodology, tolerances, and outcomes from the new audit.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Master 3 20%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 47%
Unspecified 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Chemistry 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#9,869,568
of 12,362,744 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#4,364
of 5,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,532
of 220,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#91
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,362,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.