↓ Skip to main content

Cellular Chondroplasty: A New Technology for Joint Regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Knee Surgery, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellular Chondroplasty: A New Technology for Joint Regeneration
Published in
Journal of Knee Surgery, September 2014
DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1390329
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Murphy, Frank Barry

Abstract

Cellular therapy involves the isolation, expansion, and transplantation of human cells for the replacement or regeneration of injured tissues. It is one of the most significant tissue repair strategies in the emerging discipline of regenerative medicine. Cellular strategies have been applied in joint repair for the treatment of acute cartilage injury, meniscal repair, and osteoarthritis (OA). Many of these efforts have been motivated by the apparent incapacity of cartilage to repair itself and the observation that initial trauma is likely to lead to sustained joint degeneration. A particularly important question that arises about cellular therapy in OA relates to the long-term outcome of these procedures. In addition, questions remain about the most suitable cell source, the advantages of allogeneic over autologous therapy, their potential uses in late stage OA, and, not least, the logistics of manufacturing and supply. These topics are discussed in this review, as well as an evaluation of knowledge gaps and technical obstacles that remain to be addressed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 10 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#10,042,870
of 12,552,983 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Knee Surgery
#175
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,823
of 211,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Knee Surgery
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,552,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.