↓ Skip to main content

RACK1 promotes the proliferation of THP1 acute myeloid leukemia cells

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RACK1 promotes the proliferation of THP1 acute myeloid leukemia cells
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11010-013-1798-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dalin Zhang, Qingyang Wang, Ting Zhu, Junxia Cao, Xueying Zhang, Jing Wang, Xiaoqian Wang, Yan Li, Beifen Shen, Jiyan Zhang

Abstract

The receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1), an adaptor protein implicated in the regulation of multiple signaling pathways, has been reported to contribute to the survival of leukemic progenitor cells by enhancing the activity of glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β). However, it remains unknown whether RACK1 also contributes to the oncogenic growth of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. Here, we report that transient or stable silencing of endogenous RACK1 expression by RACK1 short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) led to impaired proliferation of THP1 AML cells without inducing terminal differentiation. Further exploration revealed that RACK1 loss-of-function resulted in reduced GSK3β activity. GSK3β shRNA treatment showed similar effects to RACK1 loss-of-function. Our data collectively suggest that RACK1 contributes to THP1 cell proliferation through, at least partially, enhancing GSK3β activity. Thus, targeting RACK1 may have some important therapeutic implications in the treatment of AML.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,238,443
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#1,796
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,468
of 196,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#20
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.