↓ Skip to main content

Red-light cameras for the prevention of road traffic crashes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Red-light cameras for the prevention of road traffic crashes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003862.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Aeron-Thomas, Stephane Hess

Abstract

Road crashes are a prime cause of death and disability and red-light running is a common cause of crashes at signalised intersections. Red-light cameras are increasingly used to promote compliance with traffic signals. Manual enforcement methods are resource intensive and high risk, whereas red-light cameras can operate 24 hours a day and do not involve high-speed pursuits.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Kazakhstan 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 20%
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 29%
Social Sciences 13 19%
Engineering 8 11%
Psychology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 13 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,516,292
of 13,945,598 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,285
of 10,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,335
of 211,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#193
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,945,598 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.