You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MOF the beaten track: unusual structures and uncommon applications of metal–organic frameworks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemistry Central Journal, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13065-017-0330-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander J. Tansell, Corey L. Jones, Timothy L. Easun |
| Abstract |
Over the past few decades, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have proved themselves as strong contenders in the world of porous materials, standing alongside established classes of compounds such as zeolites and activated carbons. Following extensive investigation into the porosity of these materials and their gas uptake properties, the MOF community are now branching away from these heavily researched areas, and venturing into unexplored avenues. Ranging from novel synthetic routes to post-synthetic functionalisation of frameworks, host-guest properties to sensing abilities, this review takes a sidestep away from increasingly 'traditional' approaches in the field, and details some of the more curious qualities of this relatively young family of materials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 29% |
| Ghana | 1 | 6% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 59% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 47 | 51% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,213,731
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry Central Journal
#62
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,791
of 336,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry Central Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them