↓ Skip to main content

pH in exhaled breath condensate and nasal lavage as a biomarker of air pollution-related inflammation in street traffic-controllers and office-workers

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
pH in exhaled breath condensate and nasal lavage as a biomarker of air pollution-related inflammation in street traffic-controllers and office-workers
Published in
Clinics, December 2013
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2013(12)03
Pubmed ID
Authors

TM Lima, CM Kazama, AR Koczulla, PS Hiemstra, M Macchione, AL Fernandes, UP Santos, ML Bueno-Garcia, DM Zanetta, CD André, PH Saldiva, NK Nakagawa

Abstract

To utilize low-cost and simple methods to assess airway and lung inflammation biomarkers related to air pollution.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 25%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 28%
Environmental Science 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2014.
All research outputs
#10,016,431
of 12,516,869 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#317
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,296
of 211,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,516,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.