You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self-administration and interviewer-administration of the German Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire: instrument development and assessment of validity and reliability in two randomised studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-2-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Milo A Puhan, Michaela Behnke, Martin Frey, Thomas Grueter, Otto Brandli, Alfred Lichtenschopf, Gordon H Guyatt, Holger J Schunemann |
| Abstract |
Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is important in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite the high prevalence of COPD in Germany, Switzerland and Austria there is no validated disease-specific instrument available. The objective of this study was to translate the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ), one of the most widely used respiratory HRQL questionnaires, into German, develop an interviewer- and self-administered version including both standardised and individualised dyspnoea questions, and validate these versions in two randomised studies. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 62 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2014.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#617
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,288
of 146,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.