You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The acceptability and impact of a randomised controlled trial of welfare rights advice accessed via primary health care: qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne Moffatt, Joan Mackintosh, Martin White, Denise Howel, Adam Sandell |
| Abstract |
Qualitative research is increasingly used alongside randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to study a range of factors including participants' experiences of a trial. The need for a sound evidence base within public health will increase the need for RCTs of non-clinical interventions. Welfare rights advice has been proposed as an intervention with potential to reduce health inequalities. This qualitative study, nested within an RCT of the impact of welfare rights advice, examined the acceptability of the intervention, the acceptability of the research process and the perceived impact of the intervention. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 57 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,948,547
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,417
of 16,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,136
of 66,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.