↓ Skip to main content

Early versus delayed administration of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
141 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus delayed administration of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock
Published in
Critical Care, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0532-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaowu Bai, Wenkui Yu, Wu Ji, Zhiliang Lin, Shanjun Tan, Kaipeng Duan, Yi Dong, Lin Xu, Ning Li

Abstract

IntroductionThis study investigated the incidence of delayed norepinephrine administration following the onset of septic shock and its effect on hospital mortality.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 213 adult septic shock patients treated at two general surgical intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital over a two year period. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality.ResultsThe 28-day mortality was 37.6% overall. Among the 213 patients, a strong relationship between delayed initial norepinephrine administration and 28-day mortality was noted. The average time to initial norepinephrine administration was 3.1¿±¿2.5 hours. Every 1-hour delay in norepinephrine initiation during the first 6 hours after septic shock onset was associated with a 5.3% increase in mortality. Twenty-eight day mortality rates were significantly higher when norepinephrine administration was started more than or equal to 2 hours after septic shock onset (Late-NE) compared to less than 2 hours (Early-NE). Mean arterial pressures at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after septic shock onset were significantly higher and serum lactate levels at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours were significantly lower in the Early-NE than the Late-NE group. The duration of hypotension and norepinephrine administration was significantly shorter and the quantity of norepinephrine administered in a 24-hour period was significantly less for the Early-NE group compared to the Late-NE group. The time to initial antimicrobial treatment was not significantly different between the Early-NE and Late-NE groups.ConclusionOur results show that early administration of norepinephrine in septic shock patients is associated with an increased survival rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 335 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 52 15%
Student > Postgraduate 46 14%
Student > Master 39 12%
Researcher 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Other 69 20%
Unknown 76 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 190 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 81 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#266,404
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#128
of 6,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,463
of 266,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.