Title |
Effects of different mesenchymal stromal cell sources and delivery routes in experimental emphysema
|
---|---|
Published in |
Respiratory Research, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12931-014-0118-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mariana A Antunes, Soraia C Abreu, Fernanda F Cruz, Ana Clara Teixeira, Miquéias Lopes-Pacheco, Elga Bandeira, Priscilla C Olsen, Bruno L Diaz, Christina M Takyia, Isalira PRG Freitas, Nazareth N Rocha, Vera L Capelozzi, Débora G Xisto, Daniel J Weiss, Marcelo M Morales, Patricia RM Rocco |
Abstract |
We sought to assess whether the effects of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) on lung inflammation and remodeling in experimental emphysema would differ according to MSC source and administration route. Emphysema was induced in C57BL/6 mice by intratracheal (IT) administration of porcine pancreatic elastase (0.1 UI) weekly for 1 month. After the last elastase instillation, saline or MSCs (1×105), isolated from either mouse bone marrow (BM), adipose tissue (AD) or lung tissue (L), were administered intravenously (IV) or IT. After 1 week, mice were euthanized. Regardless of administration route, MSCs from each source yielded: 1) decreased mean linear intercept, neutrophil infiltration, and cell apoptosis; 2) increased elastic fiber content; 3) reduced alveolar epithelial and endothelial cell damage; and 4) decreased keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC, a mouse analog of interleukin-8) and transforming growth factor-β levels in lung tissue. In contrast with IV, IT MSC administration further reduced alveolar hyperinflation (BM-MSC) and collagen fiber content (BM-MSC and L-MSC). Intravenous administration of BM- and AD-MSCs reduced the number of M1 macrophages and pulmonary hypertension on echocardiography, while increasing vascular endothelial growth factor. Only BM-MSCs (IV > IT) increased the number of M2 macrophages. In conclusion, different MSC sources and administration routes variably reduced elastase-induced lung damage, but IV administration of BM-MSCs resulted in better cardiovascular function and change of the macrophage phenotype from M1 to M2. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
Russia | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
Researcher | 14 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 19% |
Unknown | 20 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 12% |
Engineering | 6 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 24 | 22% |