↓ Skip to main content

Effects of different mesenchymal stromal cell sources and delivery routes in experimental emphysema

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of different mesenchymal stromal cell sources and delivery routes in experimental emphysema
Published in
Respiratory Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12931-014-0118-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana A Antunes, Soraia C Abreu, Fernanda F Cruz, Ana Clara Teixeira, Miquéias Lopes-Pacheco, Elga Bandeira, Priscilla C Olsen, Bruno L Diaz, Christina M Takyia, Isalira PRG Freitas, Nazareth N Rocha, Vera L Capelozzi, Débora G Xisto, Daniel J Weiss, Marcelo M Morales, Patricia RM Rocco

Abstract

We sought to assess whether the effects of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) on lung inflammation and remodeling in experimental emphysema would differ according to MSC source and administration route. Emphysema was induced in C57BL/6 mice by intratracheal (IT) administration of porcine pancreatic elastase (0.1 UI) weekly for 1 month. After the last elastase instillation, saline or MSCs (1×105), isolated from either mouse bone marrow (BM), adipose tissue (AD) or lung tissue (L), were administered intravenously (IV) or IT. After 1 week, mice were euthanized. Regardless of administration route, MSCs from each source yielded: 1) decreased mean linear intercept, neutrophil infiltration, and cell apoptosis; 2) increased elastic fiber content; 3) reduced alveolar epithelial and endothelial cell damage; and 4) decreased keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC, a mouse analog of interleukin-8) and transforming growth factor-β levels in lung tissue. In contrast with IV, IT MSC administration further reduced alveolar hyperinflation (BM-MSC) and collagen fiber content (BM-MSC and L-MSC). Intravenous administration of BM- and AD-MSCs reduced the number of M1 macrophages and pulmonary hypertension on echocardiography, while increasing vascular endothelial growth factor. Only BM-MSCs (IV > IT) increased the number of M2 macrophages. In conclusion, different MSC sources and administration routes variably reduced elastase-induced lung damage, but IV administration of BM-MSCs resulted in better cardiovascular function and change of the macrophage phenotype from M1 to M2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 12%
Engineering 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,614,569
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#290
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,668
of 266,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.