You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Value of additional strain analysis with feature tracking in dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detecting coronary artery disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-014-0072-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher Schneeweis, Jianxing Qiu, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Alexander Berger, Sebastian Kelle, Eckart Fleck, Rolf Gebker |
Abstract |
Dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DS-CMR) has been established for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). The novel technique feature tracking (FT) analyses left ventricular circumferential strain (Ecc) thus offering detailed information about myocardial deformation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate FT based Ecc for the detection of myocardial ischemia during DS-CMR. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 57% |
Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2014.
All research outputs
#16,149,689
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,002
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,543
of 265,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#26
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.