You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Microbiome and infectivity studies reveal complex polyspecies tree disease in Acute Oak Decline
|
---|---|
Published in |
The ISME Journal, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1038/ismej.2017.170 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sandra Denman, James Doonan, Emma Ransom-Jones, Martin Broberg, Sarah Plummer, Susan Kirk, Kelly Scarlett, Andrew R Griffiths, Maciej Kaczmarek, Jack Forster, Andrew Peace, Peter N Golyshin, Francis Hassard, Nathan Brown, John G Kenny, James E McDonald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 21% |
United States | 4 | 17% |
Ireland | 3 | 13% |
Latvia | 2 | 8% |
Sweden | 2 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
Scientists | 8 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 19% |
Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 32% |
Environmental Science | 16 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 40 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#569,292
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The ISME Journal
#140
of 3,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,021
of 338,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The ISME Journal
#4
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.