↓ Skip to main content

CO2 laser versus cold steel margin analysis following endoscopic excision of glottic cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CO2 laser versus cold steel margin analysis following endoscopic excision of glottic cancer
Published in
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1916-0216-43-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fawaz M Makki, Matthew H Rigby, Martin Bullock, Timothy Brown, Robert D Hart, Jonathan Trites, Michael L Hinni, S Mark Taylor

Abstract

To compare the suitability of CO2 laser with steel instruments for margin excision in transoral laser microsurgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 72%
Unspecified 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2014.
All research outputs
#19,512,854
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
#329
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,849
of 315,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.