↓ Skip to main content

The effect of stroke on foot biomechanics; underlying mechanisms and the functional consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of stroke on foot biomechanics; underlying mechanisms and the functional consequences
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-7-s1-a18
Authors

Saeed Forghany, Christopher J Nester, Sarah F Tyson, Stephen Preece, Richard K Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,294,760
of 4,507,652 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#198
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,849
of 120,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.