You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing prediction of binge eating episodes: a comparison approach to test alternative conceptualizations of the affect regulation model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Eating Disorders, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40337-014-0028-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Ben Richardson, Helen Skouteris, David Austin, David Castle, Lucy Busija, Britt Klein, Millicent Holmes, Jaclyn Broadbent |
| Abstract |
Although a wealth of studies have tested the link between negative mood states and likelihood of a subsequent binge eating episode, the assumption that this relationship follows a typical linear dose-response pattern (i.e., that risk of a binge episode increases in proportion to level of negative mood) has not been challenged. The present study demonstrates the applicability of an alternative, non-linear conceptualization of this relationship, in which the strength of association between negative mood and probability of a binge episode increases above a threshold value for the mood variable relative to the slope below this threshold value (threshold dose response model). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,306,972
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#644
of 790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,760
of 245,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.