↓ Skip to main content

Switchable Plasmonic Metasurfaces with High Chromaticity Containing Only Abundant Metals

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Letters, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Switchable Plasmonic Metasurfaces with High Chromaticity Containing Only Abundant Metals
Published in
Nano Letters, October 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kunli Xiong, Daniel Tordera, Gustav Emilsson, Oliver Olsson, Ulrika Linderhed, Magnus P. Jonsson, Andreas B. Dahlin

Abstract

Plasmonic color generation offers several advantages but is also limited by the cost and availability of noble metals like gold. In this work we present color-tuneable metasurfaces with high chromaticity and reflectivity consisting of an aluminum mirror, a dielectric spacer and a plasmonic nanohole array in copper. Copper is shown to be an excellent alternative to gold when properly protected from oxidation and makes it possible to generate a wide RGB gamut covering 27% of the standard RGB. By patterning the metasurfaces into microscale pixel triplets, color photos can be well reproduced with high resolution over wafer-sized areas. Further, we demonstrate active modulation of the reflected intensity using an electrochromic conductive polymer deposited on top of the nanostructures by screen printing. This technology opens up for ultrathin and flexible reflective displays in full color, i.e. plasmonic electronic paper, compatible with large-scale sustainable production.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Researcher 9 18%
Unspecified 9 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 31%
Unspecified 13 27%
Engineering 12 24%
Materials Science 6 12%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,008,334
of 12,083,996 outputs
Outputs from Nano Letters
#2,343
of 7,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,908
of 275,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Letters
#49
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,083,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.