You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of behaviour change techniques with effectiveness of dietary interventions among adults of retirement age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-014-0177-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jose Lara, Elizabeth H Evans, Nicola O’Brien, Paula J Moynihan, Thomas D Meyer, Ashley J Adamson, Linda Errington, Falko F Sniehotta, Martin White, John C Mathers |
| Abstract |
There is a need for development of more effective interventions to achieve healthy eating, enhance healthy ageing, and to reduce the risk of age-related diseases. The aim of this study was to identify the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) used in complex dietary behaviour change interventions and to explore the association between BCTs utilised and intervention effectiveness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 34% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Ireland | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Austria | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Finland | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 34% |
| Scientists | 14 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 15% |
| Researcher | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 20% |
| Unknown | 51 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 22% |
| Psychology | 33 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 64 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,200,686
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#840
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,111
of 267,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#19
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.