↓ Skip to main content

Moving Beyond Too Little, Too Late: Managing Emerging Infectious Diseases in Wild Populations Requires International Policy and Partnerships

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moving Beyond Too Little, Too Late: Managing Emerging Infectious Diseases in Wild Populations Requires International Policy and Partnerships
Published in
EcoHealth, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10393-014-0980-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamie Voyles, A. Marm Kilpatrick, James P. Collins, Matthew C. Fisher, Winifred F. Frick, Hamish McCallum, Craig K. R. Willis, David S. Blehert, Kris A. Murray, Robert Puschendorf, Erica Bree Rosenblum, Benjamin M. Bolker, Tina L. Cheng, Kate E. Langwig, Daniel L. Lindner, Mary Toothman, Mark Q. Wilber, Cheryl J. Briggs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 125 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 22%
Researcher 27 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 47%
Environmental Science 23 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 22 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,653,614
of 12,562,772 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#220
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,941
of 212,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,562,772 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.