You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of three different anti-Xa assays in major orthopedic surgery patients treated with direct oral anticoagulant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Thrombosis Journal, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12959-017-0150-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Makoto Ikejiri, Hideo Wada, Shine Tone, Hiroki Wakabayashi, Masahiro Hasegawa, Takeshi Matsumoto, Naoki Fujimoto, Norikazu Yamada, Masaaki Ito, Kaname Nakatani, Akihiro Sudo |
| Abstract |
Measurement of edoxaban plasma concentration has been gathering attention in major orthopedic surgery patients receiving edoxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The anti-Xa activity was measured one hour after edoxaban intake using 3 different assays in 200 patients after major orthopedic surgery. The anti-Xa activities on Day 8 were significantly higher than those on Day 4 and those on Day 4 were significantly higher than those on Day 1. The anti-Xa activities in two assays closely correlated with each other, but the other anti-Xa assay did not correlated with other two assays. The anti-Xa activities as detected in the three Xa assays were significantly higher in the patients without deep vein thrombosis (DVT) than in those with DVT on Day 4. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the anti-Xa activities of assays A, B and C between patients with and without massive bleeding (MB) on Days 1, 4, 8 and 15. The results of this study suggest that anti-Xa level could be predictive of the risk of VTE, but not of the risk of massive bleeding. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 43% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,481,147
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#215
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,249
of 324,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.