↓ Skip to main content

Pleistocene cave art from Sulawesi, Indonesia

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
Title
Pleistocene cave art from Sulawesi, Indonesia
Published in
Nature, October 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13422
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Aubert, A. Brumm, M. Ramli, T. Sutikna, E. W. Saptomo, B. Hakim, M. J. Morwood, G. D. van den Bergh, L. Kinsley, A. Dosseto

Abstract

Archaeologists have long been puzzled by the appearance in Europe ∼40-35 thousand years (kyr) ago of a rich corpus of sophisticated artworks, including parietal art (that is, paintings, drawings and engravings on immobile rock surfaces) and portable art (for example, carved figurines), and the absence or scarcity of equivalent, well-dated evidence elsewhere, especially along early human migration routes in South Asia and the Far East, including Wallacea and Australia, where modern humans (Homo sapiens) were established by 50 kyr ago. Here, using uranium-series dating of coralloid speleothems directly associated with 12 human hand stencils and two figurative animal depictions from seven cave sites in the Maros karsts of Sulawesi, we show that rock art traditions on this Indonesian island are at least compatible in age with the oldest European art. The earliest dated image from Maros, with a minimum age of 39.9 kyr, is now the oldest known hand stencil in the world. In addition, a painting of a babirusa ('pig-deer') made at least 35.4 kyr ago is among the earliest dated figurative depictions worldwide, if not the earliest one. Among the implications, it can now be demonstrated that humans were producing rock art by ∼40 kyr ago at opposite ends of the Pleistocene Eurasian world.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 378 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 4 1%
Indonesia 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 309 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 23%
Researcher 56 17%
Student > Bachelor 43 13%
Student > Master 40 12%
Professor 23 7%
Other 76 23%
Unknown 20 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 74 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 18%
Social Sciences 36 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 8%
Environmental Science 21 6%
Other 71 21%
Unknown 45 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,517
of 15,062,266 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#522
of 73,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39
of 212,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#13
of 1,023 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,062,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,023 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.