↓ Skip to main content

Functional phylogenomics analysis of bacteria and archaea using consistent genome annotation with UniFam

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
weibo
3 weibo users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional phylogenomics analysis of bacteria and archaea using consistent genome annotation with UniFam
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12862-014-0207-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juanjuan Chai, Guruprasad Kora, Tae-Hyuk Ahn, Doug Hyatt, Chongle Pan

Abstract

BackgroundPhylogenetic studies have provided detailed knowledge on the evolutionary mechanisms of genes and species in Bacteria and Archaea. However, the evolution of cellular functions, represented by metabolic pathways and biological processes, has not been systematically characterized. Many clades in the prokaryotic tree of life have now been covered by sequenced genomes in GenBank. This enables a large-scale functional phylogenomics study of many computationally inferred cellular functions across all sequenced prokaryotes.ResultsA total of 14,727 GenBank prokaryotic genomes were re-annotated using a new protein family database, UniFam, to obtain consistent functional annotations for accurate comparison. The functional profile of a genome was represented by the biological process Gene Ontology (GO) terms in its annotation. The GO term enrichment analysis differentiated the functional profiles between selected archaeal taxa. 706 prokaryotic metabolic pathways were inferred from these genomes using Pathway Tools and MetaCyc. The consistency between the distribution of metabolic pathways in the genomes and the phylogenetic tree of the genomes was measured using parsimony scores and retention indices. The ancestral functional profiles at the internal nodes of the phylogenetic tree were reconstructed to track the gains and losses of metabolic pathways in evolutionary history.ConclusionsOur functional phylogenomics analysis shows divergent functional profiles of taxa and clades. Such function-phylogeny correlation stems from a set of clade-specific cellular functions with low parsimony scores. On the other hand, many cellular functions are sparsely dispersed across many clades with high parsimony scores. These different types of cellular functions have distinct evolutionary patterns reconstructed from the prokaryotic tree.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Sweden 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 66 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 29%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,480,912
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,436
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,717
of 267,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#21
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.