↓ Skip to main content

Putamen Volume is Negatively Correlated with the Ability to Recognize Fearful Facial Expressions

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Topography, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Putamen Volume is Negatively Correlated with the Ability to Recognize Fearful Facial Expressions
Published in
Brain Topography, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10548-017-0578-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shota Uono, Wataru Sato, Takanori Kochiyama, Yasutaka Kubota, Reiko Sawada, Sayaka Yoshimura, Motomi Toichi

Abstract

Findings of previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neuropsychological studies have suggested that specific aspects of the basal ganglia, particularly the putamen, are involved in the recognition of emotional facial expressions. However, it remains unknown whether variations in putamen structure reflect individual differences in the ability to recognize facial expressions. Thus, the present study assessed the putamen volumes and shapes of 50 healthy Japanese adults using structural MRI scans and evaluated the ability of participants to recognize facial expressions associated with six basic emotions: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The volume of the bilateral putamen was negatively associated with the recognition of fearful faces, and the local shapes of both the anterior and posterior subregions of the bilateral putamen, which are thought to support cognitive/affective and motor processing, respectively, exhibited similar negative relationships with the recognition of fearful expressions. These results suggest that individual differences in putamen structure can predict the ability to recognize fearful facial expressions in others. Additionally, these findings indicate that cognitive/affective and motor processing underlie this process.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Neuroscience 7 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#23,171,096
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#468
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,125
of 328,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.