↓ Skip to main content

A 2 × 2 factorial design for the combination therapy of minocycline and remote ischemic perconditioning: efficacy in a preclinical trial in murine thromboembolic stroke model

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A 2 × 2 factorial design for the combination therapy of minocycline and remote ischemic perconditioning: efficacy in a preclinical trial in murine thromboembolic stroke model
Published in
Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/2040-7378-6-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Md Nasrul Hoda, Susan C Fagan, Mohammad B Khan, Kumar Vaibhav, Aizaz Chaudhary, Phillip Wang, Krishnan M Dhandapani, Jennifer L Waller, David C Hess

Abstract

After the failure of so many drugs and therapies for acute ischemic stroke, innovative approaches are needed to develop new treatments. One promising strategy is to test combinations of agents in the pre-hospital setting prior to the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) and/ or the use of mechanical reperfusion devices in the hospital.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Unspecified 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,627,382
of 8,701,761 outputs
Outputs from Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine
#22
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,673
of 198,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,701,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them