↓ Skip to main content

Dietary supplements for chronic gout

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary supplements for chronic gout
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010156.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariano Andrés, Francisca Sivera, Louise Falzon, Rachelle Buchbinder, Loreto Carmona, Andrés M, Sivera F, Falzon L, Buchbinder R, Carmona L

Abstract

Dietary supplements are frequently used for the treatment of several medical conditions, both prescribed by physicians or self administered. However, evidence of benefit and safety of these supplements is usually limited or absent.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Unknown 99 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 21%
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Unspecified 8 8%
Other 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Unspecified 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Psychology 7 7%
Other 14 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2014.
All research outputs
#885,890
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,823
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,108
of 223,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.