↓ Skip to main content

Dietary supplements for chronic gout

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary supplements for chronic gout
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010156.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariano Andrés, Francisca Sivera, Louise Falzon, Rachelle Buchbinder, Loreto Carmona, Andrés M, Sivera F, Falzon L, Buchbinder R, Carmona L

Abstract

Dietary supplements are frequently used for the treatment of several medical conditions, both prescribed by physicians or self administered. However, evidence of benefit and safety of these supplements is usually limited or absent.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 26%
Student > Master 16 19%
Researcher 13 15%
Other 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Unspecified 6 7%
Psychology 5 6%
Other 8 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2014.
All research outputs
#790,825
of 11,346,364 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,855
of 9,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,141
of 205,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,346,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.