↓ Skip to main content

Viability analysis for multiple populations

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Viability analysis for multiple populations
Published in
Biological Conservation, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.006
Authors

Seth J. Wenger, Douglas R. Leasure, Daniel C. Dauwalter, Mary M. Peacock, Jason B. Dunham, Nathan D. Chelgren, Helen M. Neville

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 47%
Environmental Science 17 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#9,779,363
of 12,238,739 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,233
of 3,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,408
of 286,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#69
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,238,739 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.