↓ Skip to main content

Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009261.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Webster, Paul Scuffham, Monica Stankiewicz, Wendy P Chaboyer

Abstract

Indications for the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) are broadening with a range of systems now available on the market, including those designed for use on clean, closed incisions and skin grafts. Reviews have concluded that the evidence for the effectiveness of NPWT remains uncertain, however, it is a rapidly evolving therapy. Consequently, an updated systematic review of the evidence for the effects of NPWT on postoperative wounds expected to heal by primary intention is required.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 197 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 17%
Researcher 32 16%
Other 23 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 50 25%
Unknown 22 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Psychology 7 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 31 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,472,806
of 13,325,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,125
of 10,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,824
of 212,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,325,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.