↓ Skip to main content

The effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus hsryfm 1301 on the intestinal microbiota of a hyperlipidemic rat model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus hsryfm 1301 on the intestinal microbiota of a hyperlipidemic rat model
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-386
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawei Chen, Zhenquan Yang, Xia Chen, Yujun Huang, Boxing Yin, Feixiang Guo, Haiqing Zhao, Tangyan Zhao, Henxian Qu, Jiadi Huang, Yun Wu, Ruixia Gu

Abstract

Growing evidence indicates that intestinal microbiota regulate our metabolism. Probiotics confer health benefits that may depend on their ability to affect the gut microbiota. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of supplementation with the probiotic strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus hsryfm 1301, on the gut microbiota in a hyperlipidemic rat model, and to explore the associations between the gut microbiota and the serum lipids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Researcher 5 5%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 32 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,228,205
of 23,416,487 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#613
of 3,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,599
of 257,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#19
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,416,487 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.