You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combined impact of healthy lifestyle factors on colorectal cancer: a large European cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-014-0168-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krasimira Aleksandrova, Tobias Pischon, Mazda Jenab, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Veronika Fedirko, Teresa Norat, Dora Romaguera, Sven Knüppel, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Laure Dossus, Laureen Dartois, Rudolf Kaaks, Kuanrong Li, Anne Tjønneland, Kim Overvad, José Ramón Quirós, Genevieve Buckland, María José Sánchez, Miren Dorronsoro, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Aurelio Barricarte, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nicholas J Wareham, Kathryn E Bradbury, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Domenico Palli, Vittorio Krogh, Rosario Tumino, Alessio Naccarati, Salvatore Panico, Peter D Siersema, Petra HM Peeters, Ingrid Ljuslinder, Ingegerd Johansson, Ulrika Ericson, Bodil Ohlsson, Elisabete Weiderpass, Guri Skeie, Kristin Benjaminsen Borch, Sabina Rinaldi, Isabelle Romieu, Joyce Kong, Marc J Gunter, Heather A Ward, Elio Riboli, Heiner Boeing |
| Abstract |
Excess body weight, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption and certain dietary factors are individually related to colorectal cancer (CRC) risk; however, little is known about their joint effects. The aim of this study was to develop a healthy lifestyle index (HLI) composed of five potentially modifiable lifestyle factors - healthy weight, physical activity, non-smoking, limited alcohol consumption and a healthy diet, and to explore the association of this index with CRC incidence using data collected within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Scientists | 7 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 360 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 58 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 16% |
| Unknown | 88 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 12% |
| Unknown | 104 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#174,108
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#151
of 4,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,543
of 272,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#3
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.