You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgery for stress urinary incontinence due to presumed sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008306.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laercio A Silva, Régis B Andriolo, Álvaro N Atallah, Edina MK da Silva |
| Abstract |
Incontinence after prostatectomy for benign or malignant disease is a well-known and often a feared outcome. Although small degrees of incidental incontinence may go virtually unnoticed, larger degrees of incontinence can have a major impact on a man's quality of life.Conceptually, post-prostatectomy incontinence may be caused by sphincter malfunction or bladder dysfunction, or both. Most men with post-prostatectomy incontinence (60% to 100%) have stress urinary incontinence, which is involuntary urinary leakage on effort or exertion, or on sneezing or coughing. This may be due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency and may be treated with surgery for optimal management of incontinence. Detrusor dysfunction is more common after surgery for benign prostatic disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 297 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Researcher | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 61 | 20% |
| Unknown | 81 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Unknown | 92 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,124,952
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,680
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,538
of 264,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.