↓ Skip to main content

What are the health and well-being impacts of community gardening for adults and children: a mixed method systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 304)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
What are the health and well-being impacts of community gardening for adults and children: a mixed method systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-3-20
Authors

Rebecca Lovell, Kerryn Husk, Alison Bethel, Ruth Garside

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Unknown 215 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 20%
Student > Bachelor 41 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Researcher 15 7%
Other 14 6%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 50 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 44 20%
Environmental Science 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 8%
Psychology 16 7%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 59 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#443,614
of 23,385,346 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#7
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,693
of 308,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,385,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.