↓ Skip to main content

Exercises to improve function of the rheumatoid hand (SARAH): a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercises to improve function of the rheumatoid hand (SARAH): a randomised controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60998-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E Lamb, Esther M Williamson, Peter J Heine, Jo Adams, Sukhdeep Dosanjh, Melina Dritsaki, Matthew J Glover, Joanne Lord, Christopher McConkey, Vivien Nichols, Anisur Rahman, Martin Underwood, Mark A Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 170 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 18 10%
Other 46 26%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Psychology 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 30 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2019.
All research outputs
#122,815
of 14,337,890 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,676
of 33,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,003
of 213,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#44
of 535 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,337,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 535 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.