↓ Skip to main content

Exercises to improve function of the rheumatoid hand (SARAH): a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
Title
Exercises to improve function of the rheumatoid hand (SARAH): a randomised controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60998-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E Lamb, Esther M Williamson, Peter J Heine, Jo Adams, Sukhdeep Dosanjh, Melina Dritsaki, Matthew J Glover, Joanne Lord, Christopher McConkey, Vivien Nichols, Anisur Rahman, Martin Underwood, Mark A Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 179 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Other 19 10%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 49 26%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 31 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2019.
All research outputs
#126,219
of 14,548,827 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,734
of 33,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,018
of 213,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#44
of 534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,548,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.