↓ Skip to main content

High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009701.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron Budden, Lily JY Chen, Amanda Henry

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 122 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Unspecified 13 10%
Other 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 54%
Unspecified 20 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 16 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,906,959
of 12,950,731 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,598
of 10,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,967
of 212,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,950,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.