↓ Skip to main content

High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009701.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron Budden, Lily JY Chen, Amanda Henry

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 166 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 28 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,508,855
of 15,622,196 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,193
of 11,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,041
of 213,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,622,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.