↓ Skip to main content

Capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of oesophageal varices in people with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of oesophageal varices in people with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008760.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agostino Colli, Juan Cristóbal Gana, Dan Turner, Jason Yap, Thomasin Adams-Webber, Simon C Ling, Giovanni Casazza

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend performance of oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy at the time of diagnosis of hepatic cirrhosis to screen for oesophageal varices. These guidelines require people to undergo an unpleasant invasive procedure repeatedly with its attendant risks, despite the fact that half of the people do not have identifiable oesophageal varices 10 years after the initial diagnosis of cirrhosis. Video capsule endoscopy is a non-invasive test proposed as an alternative method for the diagnosis of oesophageal varices.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 46 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,729,142
of 19,383,830 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,903
of 11,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,573
of 222,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#178
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,383,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.